Dal sito "Media Ite": Rubio: Obama’s Anti-Gun Actions ‘Stuff They’ve Always Wanted To Do,’ Have Nothing To Do With Newtown".

Cari amici ed amiche.

Leggete questo articolo scritto sul sito "Media Ite" che è intitolato "Rubio: Obama’s Anti-Gun Actions ‘Stuff They’ve Always Wanted To Do,’ Have Nothing To Do With Newtown".
Esso riporta le parole del senatore della Florida Marco Rubio (nella foto) e recita:

"Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) joined the hosts ofFox & Friends on Thursday where he expressed his exasperation at the White House’s efforts to curb gun violence. He said that he thinks the executive actions President Barack Obamasigned yesterday have nothing to do with what happened in Newtown. In fact, they were anti-gun actions that “they’ve always wanted to do,” and the administration is merely exploiting the post-Newtown political atmosphere in order to get stricter gun laws on the books.

RELATED: Here Are The 23 Executive Actions Pres. Obama Just Signed To Curb Gun Violence

“By the president’s own admission, the things that they are putting forward would have done nothing to prevent what happened, for example, in Connecticut,” Rubio said of the 23 executive actionsObama signed on Wednesday. “This is not about guns, this is about violence. And what we really should be focused on is what is creating this violence in our culture.”

“Movies,” Steve Doocy suggested.

“There’s a lot of different things,” Rubio replied without getting specific.

Gretchen Carlson noted that there is an insufficient focus, in her opinion, on the how mental illness contributes to episodes of horrific gun violence.

“As policy makers, we need to take a very careful look at all of these factors, and figure out what we can do in the law to change it,” Rubio agreed. “Also, a lot of these things you can’t do anything about in the law – it’s a cultural issue.”

Florida’s junior senator went on to say that all of the executive actions signed by President Obama yesterday had nothing to do with and would not have prevented the Newtown massacre.

“The impetus for all of this was the shooting in Connecticut, right? That’s what led to this. And yet nothing he’s proposing would have prevented Connecticut,” Rubio added. “This is stuff they’ve always wanted to do, and now this has created the political climate to pursue it.”

He concluded by saying that, while he believes the White House is not as committed to the Second Amendment as he is, he does not think the White House will seek a legal repeal of the right to bear arms.".

Ringrazio dello spunto l'amico Carlos Echavarria.
In pratica, il presidente americano Barack Hussein Obama ha colto la palla al balzo per fare la sua politica contro le armi.
Il fattaccio di Newtown (nella cui scuola un ventenne fece una strage il 14 dicembre scorso) non  avrebbe influenzato Obama nel decidere di iniziare la politica contro le armi.
In realtà, egli aveva in mente di fare ciò da prima.
Obama ha solo colto la palla al balzo.
Qui si rischia di passare da un eccesso all'altro.
Posto il fatto che chi ha un'arma abbia una grossa responsabilità, se fosse proibito l'uso delle armi, ci sarebbe il rischio che in seguito venga proibita ogni legittima difesa da parte del cittadino.
Qui in Italia, la legittima difesa è prevista dalla legge ma vietata dai giudici.
Ci sono stati dei casi di commercianti che vengono aggrediti dai rapinatori e che reagiscono, uccidendo l'aggressore.
Questi, poi, rischiano di finire in galera con l'accusa di omicidio.
In poche parole, ci si difende rischia di finire in galera.
Ciò è assurdo!
Non vorrei che negli USA si finisse allo stesso modo.
Cordiali saluti.