Dear friends,
the previous article about the re-elected Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff has been commented on, even with spam comments I've censored.In one of these comments, I was asked what is the system to which I give my preference.
The answer is obvious; I'm for capitalism.
The capitalist system is the only humanly possible.
The socialist systems (or worse than communists) led only widespread poverty.
In a short time, they bring well-being.
In the long run, though, they drive up taxes and the bureaucracy, becoming untenable.
In the long run, the socialist (or communist) produces so many poor people, because those who might invest their money would run in other areas.
The capitalist system, however, is always.
Of course, it will produce the inequality between rich and poor but at the same time will ensure that there are fewer poor people.
When I speak of "poor" I mean to define those who are really in poverty and who do not even have the money to put together lunch and dinner or for treatment and not those who (for example) may not have appeared a "Ferrari".
However, if they are few, the poor can be helped.
I'd like to see how Brazil will be in twenty years.
Of course, for a capitalist system strong, always serves a strong policy to prevent a repeat of what happened in 2011 here in Italy.
I remember that in the past Dilma Rousseff was in a terrorist organization .
Sincerely.
the previous article about the re-elected Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff has been commented on, even with spam comments I've censored.In one of these comments, I was asked what is the system to which I give my preference.
The answer is obvious; I'm for capitalism.
The capitalist system is the only humanly possible.
The socialist systems (or worse than communists) led only widespread poverty.
In a short time, they bring well-being.
In the long run, though, they drive up taxes and the bureaucracy, becoming untenable.
In the long run, the socialist (or communist) produces so many poor people, because those who might invest their money would run in other areas.
The capitalist system, however, is always.
Of course, it will produce the inequality between rich and poor but at the same time will ensure that there are fewer poor people.
When I speak of "poor" I mean to define those who are really in poverty and who do not even have the money to put together lunch and dinner or for treatment and not those who (for example) may not have appeared a "Ferrari".
However, if they are few, the poor can be helped.
I'd like to see how Brazil will be in twenty years.
Of course, for a capitalist system strong, always serves a strong policy to prevent a repeat of what happened in 2011 here in Italy.
I remember that in the past Dilma Rousseff was in a terrorist organization .
Sincerely.
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento